Author Archive

Northgate’s 92% deserve a fair deal

Monday, June 4th, 2012 by

We’ve been talking a lot about Northgate recently, and for good reason.  The future construction of the Link light rail station at Northgate provides a once in a lifetime opportunity.  This is our chance to transform a 1950’s part of the city dominated by an ocean of parking lots into a bikeable, walkable and transit-rich community where everyone who wants to can safely bike or walk to the station.

According to Sound Transit, today, the Northgate Transit Center serves more than 5,000 riders each weekday, 70 percent of whom get there on bike, foot or transit.  In 2030, 92 percent of the 15,000 people accessing the light rail station each weekday will get there on bike, foot or transit.  92 percent.

But right now, instead of working to figure out how they can provide the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit with safe and convenient ways to get there, Sound Transit might spend $40 million on a 900-stall parking garage benefiting the 8 percent, and less than $2 million on the 92 percent.  That’s just not fair.

Sound Transit should focus their investments on benefiting the 92 percent of people who will get to the station on bike, foot or transit.  Investments like cycle tracks and neighborhood greenways accessing the station, a bike/pedestrian bridge over I-5 to North Seattle Community College and Licton Springs, sidewalks in the surrounding neighborhoods, and improved bus service to the station.

Northgate’s 92 percent deserve a fair deal.  Sound Transit should spend at least as much on making it safe and convenient for the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit as they are for the 8 percent.

Tonight, Monday, June 4, Sound Transit is hosting an open house from 6-8pm at the Olympic View Elementary School, 504 NE 95 St, Seattle.  Please join us to stand up and speak out for Northgate’s 92 percent and tell Sound Transit:

  1. In 2030, 92 percent of the 15,000 people accessing the light rail station each weekday will get there on bike, foot or transit. Yet you are proposing to spend $40 million on a 900-stall parking garage benefiting the 8%, and less than $2 million on the 92%. That’s just not fair.
  2. Northgate’s 92 percent deserve a fair deal. You should spend at least as much on making it safe and convenient for the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit as you are for the 8 percent.
  3. Your investments should benefit the 92 percent of people who will get to the station on bike, foot or transit. Investments like cycle tracks and neighborhood greenways accessing the station, a bike/pedestrian bridge over I-5 connecting to North Seattle Community College and Licton Springs, sidewalks in the surrounding neighborhoods, and improved bus service to the station.

We’ve also received a number of questions about this complex issue and we wanted to take a moment to answer a few of them.

Northgate Station Access – Frequently Asked Questions

Why should I care about Northgate station access issues?

Sound Transit is preparing to start construction on the North Link light rail extension project from the University of Washington to Northgate, as approved by voters in 2008.  Construction in the Northgate area is scheduled to begin in late 2013, and the extension is scheduled to open for service in 2021.  Northgate will be the first light rail station located at an existing transit center.

The construction of the light rail station at Northgate represents a unique opportunity to transform a traditionally auto-dominated neighborhood into a more walkable, bikeable, and transit-oriented community with greater access to retail, grocery stores, medical services, schools, libraries, parks, and more.  The decisions Sound Transit makes over the next few months regarding their funding priorities at Northgate can help or hinder this future.

Vision 2040 and the Regional Growth Strategy identify Northgate as an important place to accommodate some of the 1.5 million new people projected to live in the region by 2040.  With the construction of the new Link light rail station and acres of underutilized land, Northgate has a real opportunity to transform into a complete community for thousands of new residents and to benefit the surrounding neighborhoods.

What is Sound Transit proposing to do to improve access to the station?

Instead of working to figure out how they can provide the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit with safe and convenient ways to get there, Sound Transit might spend tens of millions of dollars benefiting the 8 percent at the expense of everyone else.  Even though construction of the Northgate station will permanently displace only 117 park & ride stalls (P&R) and 64 private stalls, Sound Transit is proposing to build a 600- to 900-stall parking garage that will cost between $25 and $40 million.  The garage would be built before station construction begins, increasing traffic to the station and making it more dangerous and uncomfortable for people to walk or ride their bicycle to the station.

As part of construction of the station, Sound Transit is proposing a few new and widened sidewalks and parking for 200 bicycles.  They have also adjusted the station design to incorporate other bike access improvements recommended by the Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board and to accommodate a future connection to a potential I-5 bicycle/pedestrian bridge.  All other bicycle and pedestrian access improvements are either “being considered” or “under study” and could be funded through a $1.4 million federal grant recently awarded jointly to Sound Transit, King County, and the City of Seattle (that would also fund TOD planning).

All of this adds up to $40 million for the 8 percent and less than $2 million for the 92 percent.  That’s just not fair.  Sound Transit should spend at least as much on making it safe and convenient for the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit as they are for the 8 percent.

What should Sound Transit do to provide the most people with safe and convenient access to the station?

According to Sound Transit, “it is not feasible to meet future transit demand at Northgate and achieve land use goals without shifting focus to non-driving access modes such as expanding rail-bus connections and pedestrian and bicycle access.”  Therefore, Sound Transit should focus their investments on benefiting the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit.  Investments like cycle tracks and neighborhood greenways accessing the station, a bike/pedestrian bridge over I-5 connecting to North Seattle Community College (NSCC) and Licton Springs, sidewalks in the surrounding neighborhoods, and improved bus service to the station.

Sound Transit should commit to funding a substantial percentage of the construction costs of the bike/pedestrian bridge and convene a task force of the local agencies, WSDOT, NSCC, UW Medicine, local business and property owners, community leaders, and advocacy organizations to begin a transparent process for designing and building the bridge.  Providing direct access from the station to the west side of I-5 will reunite the neighborhoods and provide station access to thousands of potential light rail riders, including the nearly 7,000 students, faculty, and staff who attend and work at NSCC.

Will the 900-stall parking garage really cost $40 million?

It’s hard to know exactly how much the 900-stall garage will cost because Sound Transit has stated that the “actual final use arrangements and cost of these stalls will be negotiated in the future.”  But a comparable project primarily funded by Sound Transit in Burien – a five-story 462-stall parking garage and adjacent surface lot with 43 stalls – cost $20.8 million, approximately $41,000 per stall.  At $41,000 per stall a 900-stall garage would cost just shy of $40 million.

Why would Sound Transit build a 900-stall garage to replace the permanent loss of 117 park & ride stalls?

It’s a great question, especially since most of the current users of the transit center live nearby and that in 2030, 92 percent of the 15,000 people accessing the light rail station each weekday will get there on bike, foot or transit.  It’s also unclear how Sound Transit will decide whether to build a 600 or a 900-stall parking garage as they have not stated what factors will affect this decision.  What is clear is that despite Sound Transit’s legal obligations to mitigate parking displaced during construction, they have many options beyond just building a parking garage, making mitigation a complex but solvable issue through creativity and innovation.

First, Sound Transit has committed to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to provide one-for-one replacement of all 117 P&R stalls permanently displaced by the project in the North Link record of decision (ROD).  However, Sound Transit could petition the FTA to waive this requirement.  Given that the ROD was signed two years before regional voters approved extending Link to Northgate, Sound Transit would have a strong basis for this petition.

Second, under the terms of the North Link ROD, ST must provide “best effort” mitigation for the 428 stalls of P&R capacity lost during construction. This could involve improved bus service (either direct to downtown, or connecting service to Northgate), pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvements, satellite parking lots with shuttles, leasing P&R stalls from adjacent private lots, or more structured parking.

Third, and most challenging, Sound Transit needs to use a substantial part of the Northgate Mall property for construction of North Link, and it has an obligation to mitigate the temporary displacement of these 462 privately owned stalls.  In addition, construction of North Link will permanently displace 64 other private stalls that Sound Transit must mitigate.  Sound Transit can either pay compensation to the owners of these stalls for the loss of parking, or provide replacement parking.

When you remodel your kitchen you don’t build an entirely new house to mitigate the temporary inconvenience.  You get by as best as you can for the lowest cost in a manner that prepares you for the future.  Sound Transit should take a similar approach.

Why is Sound Transit in such a hurry to reach a decision?

The Sound Transit Board will consider approval of the final North Link project scope schedule and budget for the Northgate station in late June.  However, at the May 24 briefing to the Sound Transit Board regarding this project, Sound Transit staff stated that they could push this back a month if necessary.  Figuring out how to provide the most people with safe and convenient access to the station is the last remaining scope issue Sound Transit needs to resolve.  In addition, construction activities in the Northgate Station area are scheduled to begin in late 2013.

Was the public involved in reaching this decision?

Kind of and no.  The North Link project has had extensive public outreach over the last decade.  Throughout this public outreach process the community and the Northgate Stakeholders Group have asked for investments that would align with their vision of transforming Northgate into a walkable, bikeable, and transit-rich community.

At the March 21, 2012 open house on 30 percent design for the Northgate station, Sound Transit staff included a shared-use parking garage as one of a number of potential options for providing people with access to the station (though they buried it at the bottom of their potential options).  Then, at a May 24, 2012 briefing to the Sound Transit Board, agency staff presented the plan they developed behind closed doors to build a 600 to 900 stall parking garage while making minimal (and nearly entirely unfunded) improvements that would benefit the 92 percent of people who will get to the station on bike, foot or transit.

Until a group of community leaders and advocacy organizations sent a joint-letter and over four hundred people emailed the Sound Transit Board expressing their deep concern with this deal (and Sound Transit subsequently scrambled to schedule an open house), Sound Transit did not have any plan in place to solicit public feedback on this decision before making it final.

*******

Northgate’s 92 percent deserve a fair deal.  Sound Transit should spend at least as much on making it safe and convenient for the 92 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit as they are for the 8 percent.

Please join us tonight, Monday, June 4, at a Sound Transit open house on the Northgate station from 6-8pm at the Olympic View Elementary School, 504 NE 95 St, Seattle and stand up and speak out for Northgate’s 92 percent

Northgate, it’s worse than we thought

Wednesday, May 30th, 2012 by

I don’t believe it.  Remember that backroom deal for Northgate that’s bad for bicycling?  Well, it’s worse than we thought.

According to Sound Transit, right now, 70 percent of the 5,000 people using the Northgate transit center daily get there on bike, foot or transit.  In 2030, 90 percent of the 15,000 people accessing the light rail station daily will get there on bike, foot or transit.  90 percent.

Agency staff present their plan to the Sound Transit Board

Yet at the Sound Transit Board meeting last week, agency staff presented the plot they hatched behind closed doors to spend $40 million of limited taxpayer dollars on a 900-stall parking garage, while tossing a few scraps at making it easier for people to safely access the station on bike, foot or transit.

Instead of working to figure out how they can provide the 90 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit with safe and convenient ways to get there, Sound Transit might spend tens of millions of dollars benefiting the 10 percent at the expense of everyone else.  That’s just not fair.

Northgate deserves a fair deal.  So does every community where Sound Transit builds a station.  From Redmond to Tacoma, Lynwood to Federal Way, Edmonds to Issaquah, and right here in Seattle – we need to stand together and let Sound Transit know that there’s a better way.

Join us at the June 4th open house and tell Sound Transit that Northgate deserves a fair deal.

An ocean of parking

As we mentioned last week, the construction of the light rail station at Northgate provides a once in a lifetime opportunity. This is our chance to transform a neighborhood dominated by an ocean of parking lots into a bikeable, walkable and transit-rich community where everyone who wants to can safely bike or walk to the station.

For a fraction of the cost of a $40 million, 900-stall parking garage for the 10 percent, Sound Transit could choose to make hundreds of small shovel-ready improvements that would benefit the 90 percent of people who will access the station on bike, foot or transit – and create more jobs than building a garage.  Improvements like cycletracks and neighborhood greenways accessing the station, a bike/pedestrian bridge over I-5 to North Seattle Community College and Licton Springs, sidewalks in the surrounding neighborhoods, and improved bus service to the station.  Improvements that the community and existing users of the transit center actually want.

We can get a fair deal for Northgate, but only if we stand together and make our voices heard at the June 4th open house.

We’d love to have you join us and ride to the open house together.  We’ll meet in front of the Green Lake Starbucks (7100 E Green Lake Dr N Seattle) at 5:15 p.m. and ride to the open house on a route past the transit center and the potential location for the proposed parking garage.

 

A Backroom Deal for Northgate that’s Bad for Bicycling

Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012 by

[UPDATE 5/22: This post has been updated to include a letter from coalition of Northgate neighborhood leaders and advocacy organizations, expressing our concern about the direction Sound Transit is taking on a planned parking garage at Northgate.]

Michelle lives less than a mile from the Northgate transit center and wants nothing more than to ride her bicycle there and catch the bus to her job in Bellevue. But she doesn’t ride because she just doesn’t feel safe.

Sound Transit should make it safer for Michelle to bike to Northgate, not more dangerous

Instead, Michelle is forced to drive less than a mile to catch the bus, or pay $11 every day for tolls and gas driving to work. There are tens of thousands of people just like Michelle living near Northgate who would love to have the opportunity to safely bike or walk to the transit center. But we haven’t made the investments necessary to make it possible.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

The construction of the light rail station at Northgate provides a once in a lifetime opportunity. This is our chance to transform a 1950’s auto-dominated part of the city into a bikeable, walkable and transit-rich community where everyone who wants to can safely bike or walk to the station.

But right now, Sound Transit is poised to spend around $40 million on a 900-stall parking garage that will actually make it more dangerous to bike and walk in the neighborhood.

Sound Transit needs to hear from you that they should make it safer for the tens of thousands of people like Michelle to bike to Northgate, not more dangerous.

For a fraction of the cost of the parking garage, we could make hundreds of small shovel-ready improvements that would make it easier and safer for people to bike, walk or take transit to the station. We’d even have enough money left over to build a bicycle/pedestrian bridge across I-5 so the seven thousand people who attend and work at North Seattle Community College – and the thousands of other people who live in the neighborhood – could easily access the station.

So why on earth would Sound Transit want to spend $40 million on a 900-stall parking garage that the community doesn’t want, the station doesn’t need, and would make it more dangerous for the tens of thousands of people like Michelle who want to safely bike or walk to the station to do so?

Honestly, we have no idea. What we do know is that Sound Transit reached a backroom deal to build a parking garage without any public involvement, none. A backroom deal that a prominent neighborhood leader described as “repulsive and offensive,” because it was reached without any consultation with the community and does not align with anyone’s vision for the future of the neighborhood.

Sound Transit doesn’t have to build a parking garage. They can choose to step back and do the hard work necessary to get this once in a lifetime opportunity right. But they’re not going to do the right thing unless they hear from you.

 

Cascade Bicycle Club Announces 2012 Early Endorsements

Wednesday, May 16th, 2012 by

Cascade Bicycle Club is proud to announce our early endorsements for the 2012 election cycle.  In order to receive an early endorsement from Cascade, candidates must demonstrate exceptional leadership in creating a better community through bicycling.

America is founded on our right to shape our own future, and if we want a future where everyone has the freedom to safely ride their bike, we need elected officials committed to building this future.

That’s why we work hard to ensure that our elected officials understand and support our vision of a community that bicycles, where bicycling is normal, convenient and safe for everyone; and why we work hard to provide our 14,000 members with information regarding candidates for elected office.

All of Cascade’s early endorsed candidates have shown a strong commitment to working toward a future Washington where everyone who wants to can ride because our state is connected by world-class bicycling infrastructure.

We’re looking forward to continuing our work with all of these fantastic leaders to make the investments in bicycling necessary to build a future where everyone has the freedom to safely ride their bicycle; whether they’re riding to work, school, the store, Vancouver, Portland, or just for the fun of it.

Cascade Bicycle Club’s 2012 early endorsements include:

Governor

Jay Inslee with his son Connor

Jay Inslee (Statewide).   Jay Inslee shares Cascade’s vision of a Washington where everyone has the freedom to safely ride their bicycle to get where they need to go.  He recognizes that all Washingtonians are better off when we invest in safe and convenient bicycle infrastructure as bicycling improves local economies, creates more jobs per dollar spent than any other type of transportation investment, and provides people with an affordable way to get around.  As a devoted rider of his bicycle to get to work and for fun, Jay has first-hand knowledge of the myriad benefits of investments in bicycling.  Whereas his opponent did not return Cascade’s questionnaire and has shown no interest in working to realize a community that bicycles, Jay Inslee has demonstrated decades of leadership in creating a better community through bicycling.

State Senate

Andy Billig (3rd – Spokane).  In his first term in the legislature, Rep. Billig established himself as a smart, devoted and effective advocate for creating a better community through bicycling.  As the vice chair of the Transportation committee, Rep. Billig displayed tremendous leadership in securing additional funding for Washington’s Safe Routes to School program and demonstrating how bicycling is a creative solution to lowering health care costs.

David Frockt (46th – Kenmore, Lake Forest Park, Northeast Seattle).  New to the Senate and its Transportation committee, Sen. Frockt demonstrated intelligence, accessibility and effectiveness in his work to make bicycling safer and more convenient.  He has a unique ability to skillfully navigate challenging transportation issues while balancing competing interests in order to find common sense solutions that make our streets safer for all.

Christine Rolfes (23rd – Kitsap County).  Sen. Rolfes has been a champion for making it convenient and safe for people to bicycle around Washington.  She’s worked hard to connect Kitsap County with Seattle and the Olympic Peninsula through her efforts to ensure a bicycle-friendly ferry system and Hood Canal bridge, helping to provide people with an affordable way to get to work while promoting tourism and economic development.

State House of Representatives

Sherry Appleton (23rd – Kitsap County).  Rep. Appleton has been a steadfast supporter of the issues important to Cascade Bicycle Club.  She is an eloquent spokesperson against policies that waste valuable taxpayer dollars and fail to solve the problems they’re intended to remedy, like licensing bicycles.

Judy Clibborn (41st – Bellevue, Mercer Island, Newcastle).  As chair of the Transportation committee, Rep. Clibborn displayed tactful leadership in providing a clear path for pro-bicycling legislation and funding for bicycle infrastructure.  She’s committed to making sure that future transportation funding decisions include significant investments in bicycling.

Eileen Cody (34th – Burien, West Seattle, Vashon Island).  Rep. Cody, an avid rider of her bicycle, has been a leader in demonstrating the strong connection between how we build our transportation system and our health.  As chair of the Health Care & Wellness committee, Rep. Cody was the second sponsor on legislation to include health in the state transportation system policy goals.

Hans Dunshee

Hans Dunshee (44th – Lake Stevens, Mill Creek, Snohomish).  Rep. Dunshee is a passionate and powerful advocate for creating jobs by funding safe and convenient bicycle infrastructure.  As chair of the Capital Budget committee, Rep. Dunshee included funding for a new grant program in the capital budget that will help cities and towns across Washington fund bicycle and pedestrian projects to help revitalize their downtown business districts.

Joe Fitzgibbon (34th – Burien, West Seattle, Vashon Island).  Rep. Fitzgibbon is a tireless and outspoken advocate for the issues important to Cascade Bicycle Club.  He prime sponsored and helped pass legislation which provides cities and counties the flexibility to use updated guidelines for designing bicycle and pedestrian projects, increasing safety and reducing project costs.

Marko Liias (21st – Edmonds, Mukilteo, Lynwood).  Rep. Liias has proven himself a reliable, accessible, and creative leader on making it easier and safer for people to bicycle.  He provided especially strong leadership working to ensure people have the freedom to use their bikes to get where they need to go on transit.

Jim Moeller (49th – Vancouver).  Rep. Moeller has been a consistent and dependable supporter of bicycling.  In 2011 Rep. Moeller prime sponsored and helped pass legislation creating a complete streets grant program.

Jamie Pedersen (43rd – Seattle).  As chair of the Judiciary committee, Rep. Pedersen played an important role in helping to pass legislation helping to protect vulnerable users of our roads.  He’s dedicated to continuing his work to make our streets safer for all, regardless of how you choose to get around.

Cindy Ryu (32nd – Edmonds, Shoreline, Woodway).  Rep. Ryu understands that especially during these challenging times, cities and towns should have local control to make their streets safer without unnecessary red tape.  She’s prime sponsored and fought tenaciously the past two years to pass the Neighborhood Safe Speeds bill, which would have made safer streets and neighborhoods by empowering cities and towns with the freedom to set speed limits to 20 miles per hour on non-arterial streets without a costly engineering and traffic study.

For more information regarding how Cascade Bicycle Club makes our electoral endorsement decisions, you can read our electoral endorsement policies and procedures here.

It’s halftime in Washington

Thursday, February 16th, 2012 by

It’s halftime in the legislature. Both chambers are in their respective caucuses discussing what they can do to advance their agenda in the second half.

It’s halftime on Washington’s streets too. People have gotten hurt and many are too scared to ride because we lack safe bicycle infrastructure. And they’re all wondering what can be done to make our streets safe again, like they were when we used to ride our bikes to school. And we’re all scared, because this isn’t a game.

Cascade Bicycle Club knows a little something about this. The defeat of Proposition 1 was a lost opportunity to secure $14 million for bicycle infrastructure over the next ten years. But we pulled together to work on our legislative agenda, and now HB 1217 – the Neighborhood Safe Speeds Bill, SHB 1700 – Safe and Flexible Design Guidelines, and HB 2370 – Adding Health to Washington’s Transportation Goals, have all passed the House and are up for consideration in the Senate. Cascade is fighting again.

I’ve seen a lot of tough political fights, experienced a lot of defeats in my life. And, times when we didn’t understand each other. It seems like we’ve lost our heart at times. When the fog of division, discord, and blame made it hard to see what lies ahead.

But after those trials, we all rallied around our legislative agenda, and acted as one. Because that’s what we do. We find a way through tough times, and if we can’t find a way, then we’ll make one.

All that matters now is what’s ahead. How do we come from behind? How do we come together? And, how do we get our bills through the Senate?

Cascade’s showing us it can be done. And, what’s true about Cascade is true about all of us.

Bicyclists can’t be knocked out with one crash. We get right back on our bikes and when we do the world is going to hear the joyful noise of thousands of bicyclists riding on Washington’s streets.

Yeah, it’s halftime Washington. And, our second half is about to begin.