Posts Tagged ‘SFAS’

Complaint dismissed. Let’s turn the tables.

Thursday, October 13th, 2011 by

As we expected, the complaint Gene Hoglund filed with the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission against Cascade Bicycle Club was dismissed today. During the time that Mr. Hoglund’s complaint has been active, we’ve watched and read inaccuracies about and allegations made against our organization and our mission. It’s difficult to sit on the sidelines when our reputation is being damaged.

By filing frivolous complaints like this, our opposition shows they are grasping at straws because their position has so little substance. This is a distraction technique.

You see, there is a struggle going on. A struggle for the vision of what will make our city and region great. You know you can count on Cascade to stand strong for a better future. On the Missing Link. On Transportation 2040. On the tunnel. In the legislature. In our classes. In our communities.

And right here on our city streets.

This is what Proposition 1 is about. The future. For some reason, our opposition is satisfied with a future that maintains the status quo where our buses are slow and unreliable, where it’s not always safe to cross the street or for our kids to walk or bike to school, and where our roads our littered with potholes.

We see a different future, a vision we believe you share. You and I are making incremental changes that will add up to a sustainable future. And people want to stop us from making that progress toward that vision.

Stand strong with us. Don’t let these bullies knock you down. The next incremental change we need to make is to approve Proposition 1 in the next election. So please, get up to speed, volunteer to help, support the campaign, tell your friends and let’s make progress happen.

Let’s get this done!

How can you oppose safer streets for everyone?

Monday, October 10th, 2011 by

We learned today that Cascade Bicycle Club is being investigated for improperly using funds to support the Streets for All Seattle campaign promoting a yes vote on Seattle Proposition 1 on the fall ballot.

We are confident that the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission (“SEEC”) will find that there have been no violations by Cascade Bicycle Club in this manner. We expect the complaint to be dismissed without merit.

Sadly, this frivolous complaint attempts to degrade the good work being done to make Seattle a more livable city by investing in transit, walking, biking and roadway improvements.

From 2008 through 2010, Cascade Bicycle Club Education Foundation was contracted by the city of Seattle through an RFP process to perform services related to teaching safe riding classes to kids and adults, outreach in neighborhoods by residential request, putting helmets on heads, delivering enrichment programs for disadvantaged youth, and providing safety improvements around schools.  The majority of the work completed during this time was to implement the City of Seattle’s three-year Bike Smart Seattle program, which was established under Mayor Greg Nickels leadership and funded through the Bridging the Gap levy. In 2011, we continued ongoing free and low-cost helmet sales at community events.

In contrast, our support for Streets for All Seattle and Proposition 1 has been funded by money raised through BikePAC, a registered political action committee. BikePAC is funded through private, voluntary giving. None of BikePAC’s funding comes from the City of Seattle. On Oct. 3, BikePAC paid $3,000 to Streets for All Seattle in support of Proposition 1 in the November election.

Our opposition hasn’t been careful in looking at—or don’t know about—the range of activities Cascade does. Our political work happens through our 501(c)4 organization, while our education and outreach work occurs within our 501(c)3. For tax and legal purposes, we are meticulous about getting this right. We have been independently audited, and all audits have been clean.

In other words, there is absolutely no connection between any of the contractual work we completed for the City of Seattle and our efforts to pass Proposition 1.

We are disappointed that our opposition is wasting citizen tax dollars and the city payroll’s time by filing this distracting, meritless complaint. Lacking true substance, the opposition campaign is grasping at straws. We, and the many other endorsers of Proposition 1, look forward to continuing the conversation with voters about how Prop. 1 will make our transit faster and our streets safer. Cascade Bicycle Club will continue to educate voters on how voting yes for Proposition 1 is the right choice.

Prop. 1 will invest $100 million to make transit in Seattle faster and more reliable. 95% of all Seattle residents and 96% of all the jobs in the city are within an easy walk or bike ride to the high priority transit corridors that Prop. 1 will invest in. Transit riders across the whole city will see benefits.

The transit investments Prop. 1 makes will last. They are capital, permanent, long-term improvements that will last for years. Bus lanes, transit signal priority, bus bulbs so buses don’t get stuck behind traffic when loading/unloading passengers. These are common sense things that will make our buses faster and more reliable.

Prop. 1 doubles the annual investment in new sidewalks Seattle makes today.

Prop. 1 nearly doubles the number of local, neighborhood re-paving projects Seattle can do per year.

Prop. 1 dramatically expands family-friendly bicycle infrastructure.

Prop. 1 is balanced. It makes transit faster, fixes our roads, and makes our transportation system safer for all users in Seattle. It helps the whole system across the city.

We stand behind our endorsement of Proposition 1, and we urge voters to join us in voting YES on the November ballot.

Vote Pro-Bike: Cascade issues endorsements for the general election

Tuesday, September 27th, 2011 by

Post co-written by John Mauro, Director of  Policy, Planning & Govt Affairs and Kevin Carrabine, Board of Directors and Legislative Committee Chair.

In less than a month, your ballot will arrive in the mail—and you’ll need to make decisions about who should represent you, your vision for our community and your values.

Of course, we know that most if not all of you share our vision for a community where bicycling is safe, normal, and embraced by everybody and where it contributes to a healthier, more livable and more economically vibrant place to work, live, learn and play. We also know that most if not all of you value pro-bicycle policies (like complete streets ordinances) and bicycle infrastructure (like buffered bike lanes and protected cycletracks)—they’re what give us room on the road, keep us safe and allow us to get where we’re going conveniently.

Vision and values become reality through the political process. And that’s why Cascade evaluates and then endorses candidates and measures. Cascade’s board of directors approved early endorsements in June, primary endorsements in July and has now voted to endorse the following for the general election:

Ballot Measures

Candidates

Vote

Please do your part in creating a better community through voting for bicycling. Better yet, volunteer for a campaign and tell your friends, too. (Hint: use the Share It! buttons below.) Together, we can transform our community into the vision of a safer, more mobile, more livable and downright better and more bikeable place for all.

Confirm your legislative district and voter information here.

Review Cascade Bicycle Club’s Endorsement Policies and Procedures (PDF).

Learn more about Cascade’s endorsement process and how to get involved at our Elections Page. We will update this page as we continue to evaluate candidates in the coming weeks, and we’ll post the latest news here on the Bike Blog.

Vote YES on Proposition 1 – Keep Seattle Moving

Monday, September 12th, 2011 by

Cascade Bicycle Club is proud to announce our endorsement of Proposition 1, the ballot measure that will create a better transportation future for Seattle.

Cascade played a significant role in the development of Prop. 1. In fact, you could say that Cascade has been working toward this moment for over three decades.

I grew up in Broadview, tucked away in the northwest corner of Seattle. We didn’t have sidewalks in Broadview growing up. Heck, our street wasn’t even paved until my parents got together with our neighbors to form our own one street local improvement district.

As a kid, my bicycle was my ticket to freedom. It allowed me to go visit my friends all over the neighborhood and I could always tell where my friends were hanging out by the pile of bikes in the front yard. But we never rode our bikes outside of the quiet streets of Broadview. It just wasn’t safe.

It was more than my bicycle, however, that gave my friends and me the opportunity to explore our city. We used to take the bus to Southeast Seattle to visit our friends from school and to Northgate to try to meet girls (we normally failed). Taking the bus from one corner of the city to the other took nearly half the day, which didn’t leave us with much time to hang out.

Five years ago my wife Stacy and I moved back to Seattle so that we could start a family, and I could attend the Evans School of Public Affairs and learn how to create a better future. Returning to my childhood home three decades later, Broadview still has no sidewalks, it’s still not safe for kids to ride their bikes around Seattle, and it still takes half the day to take the bus from one corner of our city to the other.

Yes, we’ve made a lot of progress as a city. We adopted a Bicycle Master Plan and have taken significant steps forward in building out our bicycle infrastructure. We built a light rail line and have plans to dramatically expand the network. We adopted one of the most progressive Pedestrian Master Plans in the country (and then forgot to fund it). But at the end of the day, Seattle still has a long way to go to become the type of city we know it should be.

Stacy and I learned this first hand. We lucked into a place three blocks up the hill from the Locks in Ballard. The 44 ran two blocks from our front door to half a block from the Evans School. But when I took the bus to and from class, it kept taking me an hour to go five miles. So I decided to try riding my bike. Despite one large missing link, I could take the Burke-Gilman directly across town to school in under half an hour. The second day I was riding to class I got hit by a car. I was fine. Both the driver and I made mistakes that resulted in the incident. It was a giant wake up call.

Stacy wasn’t so lucky. She landed a job just up the hill from Gasworks, almost directly on the Burke. She’s not really a cyclist, but given that there’s not a good way to take the bus from our home to her work and $4 a gallon gas makes driving incredibly expensive, she decided to give riding a try. On her first attempt she got run off the road. That’s the last time Stacy ever rode her bike in Seattle.

But for me, bicycling was the only way I could get around. We could only afford one car so riding my bike was simply the fastest (and often only) way for me to get to work or school. After both Stacy and my incidents, I sought out and received an appointment to Seattle’s Bicycle Advisory Board because I wanted to help make our streets safer for bicyclists. There I had an incredible opportunity to work with passionate volunteers learning the ins and outs of bicycling in Seattle. The most important thing I learned was that we need a lot more money for bicycling facilities (a whole lot more) if we want to get serious about making bicycling a realistic option for people like Stacy who want to ride, but just aren’t safe.

Even though it seems everyone in Seattle talks about how we should be a city where everyone has the freedom to safely walk, bike, drive, or take transit to get where they need to go, for whatever reason, we aren’t aligning our infrastructure investments with this vision. We’re not spending our money in a manner which will create the future we want to live in.

This is exactly why I was proud to join with the Cascade Bicycle Club in launching the Streets For All Seattle campaign last year. We believed that the time had arrived for our city to get serious about funding the pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure that our citizens demand and build a transportation system that will make Seattle work for our future.

We built a coalition of over 60 community, labor, business, political, transportation and environmental organizations who shared our vision of Seattle being a city where everyone has the freedom to safely walk, bike, drive, or take transit to get where they need to go. We set out to engage the entire city in a conversation about how we can build a better transportation future and give our elected officials the support they need to do the right thing.

We made things happen. We pushed the Seattle City Council to create a Transportation Benefit District to fund pedestrian and bicycle improvements and support basic street maintenance, and to form the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee III (CTAC III), asking them to undertake a full review of the city’s transportation funding system and evaluate the potential for a ballot measure asking Seattle voters to fund additional transportation projects.

CTAC III performed a comprehensive review of how Seattle can fund and build a transportation system that will work for the future. When they reached out to and listened to the people of Seattle they heard some common themes: We want more walkable streets, family-friendly bicycle infrastructure, faster, more reliable buses, and streets that aren’t littered with potholes. More importantly, we expressed a willingness to pay for these investments because they would help us become the city we know we should be. Cascade had a seat at the CTAC III table and learned a ton through this conversation.

After crunching the numbers, reviewing the plans, and listening to the people, CTAC III asked the City Council to give Seattle voters the opportunity to vote yes on a package that would raise considerable funds for walking, biking and transit infrastructure, along with significant money to fix and maintain Seattle streets.

The City Council did their jobs, tweaking and refining CTAC III’s recommendation into Proposition 1, and on Aug. 16, they unanimously voted to send it to the November ballot.

Proposition 1 will give Seattle faster, more reliable transit service; repaired and repaved roads that work better for everyone; and new sidewalks, better crosswalks, and more family-friendly bike infrastructure. Now, we’ve transformed Streets For All Seattle from a coalition working toward a shared vision into the campaign to pass Proposition 1, a package of investments that will help achieve our shared vision.

It was an easy decision for Cascade to endorse Proposition 1. It 1 will generate $14 million for bicycle infrastructure over the next ten years. That’s enough to build twenty miles of neighborhood greenways and forty miles of bike lanes and sharrows. It will dramatically accelerate the implementation of the Bicycle Master Plan (and the Transit and Pedestrian Master plans) and provide the funding necessary for Seattle to start building separated facilities for the thousands of people like Stacy who want to ride, but just aren’t safe. Hopefully, it will help prevent more tragic and unnecessary deaths.

Proposition 1 is too modest of a package to solve all of our transportation problems, but it’s an opportunity to create a better transportation future. An opportunity to start becoming a city where we can rely on the bus to get us to work on time, the roads are smooth, and our children can ride their bikes to school.

If you’re reading this blog you probably care about creating a better community through bicycling. That’s exactly what Proposition 1 will do. We’ve got let than two months to get this done, please join us and let’s make it happen.

We’re kicking off the campaign on Tuesday, Sept. 13, 6 p.m., at the Moe Bar on Capitol Hill (1425 10th Ave); I hope to see you there.

And if you would like to volunteer, please email Cascade Advocacy Campaigns Manager, Max Hepp-Buchanan or give him a call at (206) 226-1040.

Tall skinny mocha, please. No whip.

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011 by

[September update: Proposition 1 is set at $60, which means it's even easier to bike off those miles. Join me in supporting Proposition 1 for a faster transit, safer streets, more sidewalks and improved bike infrastructure. --M.J.]

Continuing on my blog post from yesterday, today I thought I’d figure out how to absorb the proposed $80 Vehicle License Fee (VLF) into my budget.

When CTAC III asked people how they wanted to fund transportation projects, citizens didn’t like adding it to sales tax or property tax. Instead, they supported adding a VLF. Some people have argued that the VLF is a regressive tax. We’d like to see a different revenue structure in place (perhaps connected to a vehicle’s value), but the state only allows a flat fee.

Here's how much is allocated to bike and ped projects. Click to see the full chart.

Based on citizen feedback, the committee has recommended an $80 VLF. I could break it down into number of lattés, but that’s been done so many times before. Besides, I don’t like lattés, and I’m not going to give up coffee.

But I could give up some car trips.

For me, the VLF is about getting the bike infrastructure to encourage me to bike more often. I calculated how many miles I need to bike — rather than drive — in order to recoup the $80 VLF, a portion of which will invest in the very projects I want.

It takes about 12 gallons to fill my car’s gas tank. At the rate of $3.89/gallon, a tank of gas costs $46.68. My car gets 21 MPG, so that means I drive 252 miles per tank.

At that rate, one $80 VLF charged against my car would equal 1.71 tanks of gas, for which I could drive 431 miles.

Or, instead of driving and paying $80 in gas, I could bike those 431 miles and earmark the $80.

My round-trip family bike commute is 14.2 miles. That’s just 31 roundtrip bike commutes per year that I need to do to save $80.

Since I’m biking with kids, I feel most comfortable riding during longer daylight months, let’s say the 32 weeks from mid-March through mid-October. At a rate of 31 commute trips needed per year, this fits with my goal to family bike commute at least once a week. Now throw in some trips to the park, grocery store, library and playdates… and Bike Month and the Commute Challenge in May…

And since I’m not even calculating the actual cost of driving AND all the externalities [positives from biking: health, fitness, happiness; negatives from driving: pollution, congestion, wear and tear], it looks like I can easily bike off the $80 fee and still come out ahead, with some money left over for lattés.

Or maybe mochas. I happen to like mochas.